View Full Version : Festering sore
Lata Tude
06-16-2003, 06:52 PM
A British study shows that Bush is more unpopular than Pol Pot, Josef Mengeles and Oliver Cromwell. Europeans believe that the United States is more dangerous than Al Qaedda. 85% of Russians believe Bush is a threat to the world.
NYURepublican
06-16-2003, 07:18 PM
So? Are we supposed to care?
________
Web Shows (http://livesexwebshows.com/)
bouttime
06-17-2003, 01:52 AM
its about time the U.S. stood up and said Knock this Sh*
SuffolkMD
06-17-2003, 10:15 AM
Tude,
What British Study?
Europeans believe? What Europeans?
We welcome your input, but don't give us garbage. If you are going to cite a study, then cite it!!!!
THis way, we can evaluate the truth and accuracy of it for discussion. As it stands now, I don't believe your study exists.
SuffolkMD
________
MEDICAL MARIJUANA SEEDS (http://marijuanaseeds.org/)
Lata Tude
06-17-2003, 12:24 PM
The complete report is in the Monday 16th edition of the Washington Post. Next time do your own research. This is the last time I help you.
Mylezylez
06-17-2003, 02:02 PM
Jeez,
SuffolkMD, NYURepublican, please stop complaining about the way everyone posts. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean you have to concoct a million and one reasons not to listen (including not answering a question promptly, not citing a source, POSSIBLY bng a democrat, etc.)
________
PinkPegasus (http://www.girlcamfriend.com/cam/PinkPegasus/)
NYURepublican
06-17-2003, 02:07 PM
This is not a liberal vs. conservative issue; I don't care who the hell you are, if you're going to talk about a news story, it's just considerate for you to at l name the source or post a link to it; that is, if you want to be taken seriously. I don't think that's asking too much.
________
BUY BUBBLERS (http://bubblers.net/)
Lata Tude
06-17-2003, 02:30 PM
How many "links" did YOU post during the previous administration? You republicans were coming up with "un-named" sources about a million a minute. You're seem upset about the "sourcing" only when it's unfavorable to the current occupant of the White House.
If YOU wish to be taken serious, start reading some European and Asian newspapers and wean yourself of the Fox lie. You'll feel much better not merely because you know the news but also because you know the truth.
NYURepublican
06-17-2003, 02:37 PM
You're not doing anyone else's research, you're doing your own. If you post something that's sourced elsewhere, it's common courtesy to post a link to that source so others can read it and so we know you're not just blowing smoke. Not that it matters in such an inconsequential case as this. Edited by: NYURepublican at: 6/17/03 7:09 pm
________
Web shows (http://livesexwebshows.com/)
NYURepublican
06-17-2003, 03:33 PM
Quote:How many "links" did YOU post during the previous administration?
I was in high school during the "previous administration".
Quote:You republicans were coming up with "un-named" sources about a million a minute.
Ah, but wasn't it beautiful when a stained blue dress was able to say so much more than we ever could have?
I repeat: quit your bitching, and post a link next time. If that's too complex for you to do, then don't bother posting at all. Edited by: NYURepublican at: 6/17/03 8:05 pm
________
Sick from prilosec (http://www.classactionsettlements.org/lawsuit/prilosec/)
SuffolkMD
06-19-2003, 09:24 AM
Lata Tude and Miles,
What hostility! You mention a "study" without giving a source, I ask you to name it, and you attack ME?
And Miles, are you just going to sit back and say "Wow, that's terrible" without checking it out? Aren't you more intelligent than that?
Tude, I should read more Asian papers?????
I'm not sure why! Do you think I will get the truth from Chinese newspapers?
Or the Washington Post? Don't cite me a newspaper article that cites a study. In court that would be known as hearsay. Cite me the study. I'll do my homework, once you cite me the source, then we can have "intelligent" conversation.
What else you got?
SuffolkMD
________
Mary jane (http://maryjanes.info/)
The dems are in an attack mode left over from the Clinton days. Truth doesn't matter but slandering your opponet and denigrating them in the media are. In the town of Huntington these left wing radicals in the democratic party will also attack you physically then continue to desecrate thr opponet in the press. Many people who are not that politically connected are disgusted with the way government is run here in Huntington. It's no different on this web site.
________
Marijuana Vaporizer (http://vaporizer.org/)
Mylezylez
06-19-2003, 01:58 PM
Are you claiming there are "liberals" in Huntington who beat you up on sight?
Why do you think the "left" is attacking the Republican party? If I'm not mistaken, the Republicans have done a good job of almost completely abolishing checks and balances in this country, and yet they keep complaining that the democrats are doing the same thing. They are NOT, by the way.
Can I ask how many people who post on this board are actually affiliated with the Republican party? I mean an active member; contributing money, etc.
The only reason I ask is, it's hard to believe people would believe in ANY political party so fervently, that they seriously strike back at any criticism.
________
Vaporizer review (http://vaporizers.tv/)
SuffolkMD
06-21-2003, 04:20 AM
Miles,
How have the Republicans abolished checks and balances?
Bill Clinton has stated that he supports the elimination of term limits for President.
Hillary Clinton, on her first day on the job as Senator from a state she knows nothing about, supported the elimination of the electoral college.
Chuck Schumer won't let any federal judge be confirmed, and is actively filibustering nominations, unless this judge agrees with the leftist ideology of the Democratic Party.
And it's Democrats who are actively eliminating the ultimate check on a corrupt government by eliminating an armed citizenry.
So tell me again, WHO is abolishing checks and balances?
SuffolkMD
________
BUY SILVER SURFER VAPORIZER (http://vaporizers.net/silver-surfer-vaporizer)
Mylezylez
06-21-2003, 07:51 AM
SuffolkMD,
Can you PLEASE abandon this "if you didn't name a source, you must be lying" kick you're on.
Actually, it was a survey conducted by the BBC I believe of about 20,000 people from various countries.
Now, take this (along with ANY other poll) with a grain of salt, since polls are NEVER sufficiently accurate. But, this is a much more comprehensive poll than most American ones, which usually only use a few hundred, or up to a few thousand at most.
In ther case, if most of the world is telling us that America is doing some not-so-good things right now, why wouldn't we listen? Arrogance? Are we REALLY that much better than them?
________
MARYJANE (http://maryjanes.info/)
SuffolkMD
06-21-2003, 08:17 AM
Yes, we are, and if you don't think so, then it just rnforces the fact that you are un-patriotic.
And what is the problem with citing the source? If you are going to take the time to write the article, cite the source so that we can verify the truth of your statement. If you are afraid to cite the source of your study, then you probably are lying about it.
Gotta go for today
Suffolk
________
Dodge Omni (http://www.dodge-wiki.com/wiki/Dodge_Omni)
mlwilson
06-21-2003, 11:56 AM
I love know nothings like suffolkmd.
Please explain how approving 126 of 128 Judicial nominations is allowing "any Federal judge to be confirmed"
If you as good at medicine as you are at political math God help your patients!:
jesus levine
06-21-2003, 04:40 PM
Dear Mylezylez et. al.,
The political persuasion of someone posting on this board is something that only people of sub-normal intelligence would be pre-occupied with.
NYU kid is just that-a kid. Leave him alone. Despite what some people think, America can act unilaterally as it's the only game in town. The whole EU has less than half our military prowess, and are about equal to us economically. A glaring problem for you and your ilk however is that the "blame-America-first" coalition of France and Germany with thr cheering section in the Democratic party has few adherents in the states. Among people who work for a living(I.e. not students the elderly or unemployed, Bush's approval is over 60%-and thank god we vote-Source, unpublished NRCC poll commissioned in late 2002)
If you hate Bush, turn around and vote him out, otherwise just take it and keep your mouth shut like your starring in a guest appearance on OZ.
Love it or leave it!
Mylezylez
06-23-2003, 07:31 AM
SO,
Does that mean you think it's okay that this administration continually, and blatantly supports corporate interests at the expense of people's lives?
Is it okay that this President was selected in the single most corrupt presidential election ever (I can't believe people still deny that. There's documented proof!)
Is it okay that the Republican party has been on the extreme offensive, bullying bills through congress, and using extreme partisanship to dismantle some very important checks and balances?
There are hundred and hundreds of examples of wrongdoing by this current administration, all of which can be verified. But inexplicably, most people seem not to care, or actually believe that it doesn't matter.
________
perfect tits Webcams (http://www.girlcamfriend.com/webcam/big-tits/)
TheRealThing
06-23-2003, 07:48 AM
Quote:So? Are we supposed to care?
Well, aren't we bng childish. If no one cares, why are they constantly and desperately trying to justify the war to Europe?
________
trichomes (http://trichomes.org)
jesus levine
06-25-2003, 07:36 AM
My......
The firece partisanship engaged in by people like you and the Rush Limbaugh types does little to further any real dialogue. Name calling is a lzy endeavor. On the right or left, little sense can be made from people who assume that political party affiliation makes someone resposnible for any and all actions by the administration in question. Every administration has done some questionable things, but that is the price of freedom I suppose. Only automatons can follow lindly, not people in a free republic.
As I'm sure you know, people in a democracy have a duty to vote, but thr obligation is moral rather than legal (If it were maybe Dems would win more-maybe not). Democrats don't really vote in the numbers they used to-based upon the BOE numbers. I believe that what has hurt turnout is the fact that stealth candidates such as Bill Clinton turned thr back on progressive causes and became Democrats in Name Only, or DINO's. This helped Dems in the short term, but destroyed thr turnout model. Maybe if Dean is the candidate, we can have a real national debate abut democracy and the role f government.
When someone cannot muster strength at the ballot box they engage in invective and slander. The fact is that people like Bush regardless of what you may hope for and he will win re-election. I hope that the sour grapes don't make you whine anymore.
Word of advice-From now on simply pick a fight with someone who was born prior to the 1970's and not a kid who cannot argue the use of the Panama Canal treaties as a political issue n the 1978 midterms.
TheRealThing
06-25-2003, 10:07 AM
Quote:Yes, we are, and if you don't think so, then it just rnforces the fact that you are un-patriotic.
Don't misunderstand. I'm laughing at you, not with you.
________
Honda E series history (http://www.honda-wiki.org/wiki/Honda_E_series)
Score
07-21-2003, 03:29 PM
Suffolk MD 6 Others 3.
vBulletin® v3.6.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.