IS RICE THE FEMALE SPOTA?

[GUEST1111]

What is up with this recent arrest of a NYC police officer/union official who took his delegate's checks to a bar in Floral Park and cashed them?

While the checks were cashed in Nassau County it does seem that this is a New York City and NYPD issue.

DA Rice's spokesperson said the DA is focusing on corruption cases. What the hell does this have to do with police corruption?

It sounds to me as though the union delegates told the trustee to take our checks and cash them and do what you have to do with the money.

Whatever was done with the checks, it seems to be an issue for a NYC prosecutor to resolve, not the Nassau County district attorney.

Ms. DA, stop trying to make your 'bones' on the backs of your cops. Surely, even a fine police department as the NCPD has a few corrupt cops in it's ranks for you to legitimately pursue.

Unlike your counterpart in Suffolk County you have yet to be accused of being too cozy with the police in that you have to offer up some sacrifical lambs to the gods for slaughter.

Lighten up, we all know you have the makings of being a vicious prosecutor.

On the other hand your recent actions make me feel better about the police department that patrols the area in which I live. If this is the best you can do, then I guess my police officers are pretty much an honest lot.

What is up with this recent arrest of a NYC police officer/union official who took his delegate's checks to a bar in Floral Park and cashed them?

While the checks were cashed in Nassau County it does seem that this is a New York City and NYPD issue.

DA Rice's spokesperson said the DA is focusing on corruption cases. What the hell does this have to do with police corruption?

It sounds to me as though the union delegates told the trustee to take our checks and cash them and do what you have to do with the money.

Whatever was done with the checks, it seems to be an issue for a NYC prosecutor to resolve, not the Nassau County district attorney.

Ms. DA, stop trying to make your 'bones' on the backs of your cops. Surely, even a fine police department as the NCPD has a few corrupt cops in it's ranks for you to legitimately pursue.

Unlike your counterpart in Suffolk County you have yet to be accused of being too cozy with the police in that you have to offer up some sacrifical lambs to the gods for slaughter.

Lighten up, we all know you have the makings of being a vicious prosecutor.

On the other hand your recent actions make me feel better about the police department that patrols the area in which I live. If this is the best you can do, then I guess my police officers are pretty much an honest lot.

The jerk, was a resident of NC and cashed the checks in NC, as a result the NC DA had every right getting involved

[GUEST1111]

Like I said, it pleases me that if this is all she got for 'corruption', a NYC police officer cashing checks in Nassau County that originated in NYC, and she paints it with the brush of corruption? I have to tell you that I am happy she can't find any real corrupt NC police officers to prosecute.

The matter was investigated and the NC DA Dillon did investigate it and passed on it. What more does she need to do with a BS case like this?

Are there even complainants in this case? I haven't heard of any.

I am not giving the accused a free pass on this. If he in fact stole the checks and cashed them, then he deserves to be fired and arrested. But there is more to this than meets the eye.

If you think a trustee is going to get away with stealing another cop's check and think he could get away with it. OK.......

[surly]

Touro Law School broad is hot, in a transvestite sort of way....

[GUEST1111]

But I won't. One short letter of maybe no more than 100 words and BANG, she has a case.

All the evidence is there and can't be erased no matter what they do.

Back almost 40 years ago an old detective told me if you are ever going to take anything, take case. And don't go back for it.

Never leave a paper trial. you can't hide from it. Sorry Kathy but you ain't gonna hear about it. Don't like your style.

I can't believe people are so greedy and stupid they would leave their 'fingerprints' all over the crime scene....

I think Rice should re-investigate who was in Room 910.

Comparing Rice to Spota? Only in her dreams.

Spota is a rel DA , a competent DA. He actually gets to spend his time winning cases for the people of Suffolk instead of spending time defending cases of subjorning perjury.

Maybe it all the dope she says she smoked?

Never leave a woman to do a man's job.

The proof is in the pudding.

[GUEST1111]

Comparing Rice to Spota? Only in her dreams.

Spota is a rel DA , a competent DA. He actually gets to spend his time winning cases for the people of Suffolk instead of spending time defending cases of subjorning perjury.

Maybe it all the dope she says she smoked?

Why on Earth would Spota investigate perjury when it is his own people who are the perjurers?

The man is a carbon copy of the office going way back for years. He even used a private lawyer who was himself cited for perjury multiple times in the SIC report. The lawyer brought in a witness to commit perjury. Not only did he do that but his new client testified against his other client in the grand jury!

My friend, I am sure you will disagree with me 1000%, but I would take a Rice over a Spota any day of the week. She can't be a worse 'nefarious scoundrel' than he is.

In all my 42 years in and out of law enforcement experience have I ever seen such outrageous lies in one case that I was involved with. They were spectacular! beyond words can describe. Not one, but many, many, many. They were told by two detectives, and by four miscreant witnesses, two of which were proven liars in a court of law.

Look, I don't mind a tough and aggressive DA. They should be tough. But you must have an honest one above all. Mr. Spota is NO SUCH thing.

Oddly, Spota and the lawyer he is in bed with on my case were both mentioned in the same SIC report as being involved in corruptive practices.

It is a disgrace!!!

[GUEST1111]

When a district attorney and the police bring a person to testify at trial who has already been proven to be a liar, then they are obligated to go further to assess the credibility of the witness.

When the DA and the police bring forth a witness who gives testimony that is 100 % conflicted with the KNOWN FACTS, facts that the DA and police have for themselves, and they do nothing with that information other than attempt to hide it from the defense - that is perjury!!!

When a witness tells you a story that is clearly disputed and you know of those disputed items and don't check them against the statement, then you are a LIAR yourself.

When a witness testifies to what you know to be true, or thought was true and one point in the investigation and you continue to let him lie, it suggests two things: You have supplied him with the information as you 'thought' you knew it. But you didn't do your job completely. The evidence is irrefutable. What it tells me without any question of any doubt is not only did the witness lie, it was the police who told him what to say. The idiots just got it wrong.

It also tells me that they ( DA and PD ) have been getting away with lies for so long that they don't even bother to try and tell a good one when they have to. Trust me when I tell you that no one really wants this kind of law enforcement from the people we elect. Sure, it's OK when it is the other guy. Sheriff Spota is cleaning up the town like Wyatt Earp. It's fun time for them.

The man is a liar. He is surrounded by liars. He even has people on his staff that are conflicted with their own problems. He has done nothing about it.

Any man who would go do an interview with the NY Times and say he wanted to be a prosecutor because he arrests people and deprive them of their liberty - it is the Ultimate Power, is a very sick man, indeed.

No man should enjoy having that power. Somebody has to do it - but say you enjoy the power of doing it is something else again.

It is a sad day when you have to put a man in a cage like an animal. Necessary? sure, and it has to be done because we as a society are not enlightened enough to deal with it any other way. Yes, it would be nice to give the bad guy a magic pill and make him better. That would be more enjoyalbe, but it ain't gonna happen.

Maybe the Muppets made him say that in his interview.

The guy seemed to get great pleasure by freeing a murderer when he was a private attorney by giving the court the insanity defense where his client said, "the muppets made me do it" Ha,ha, Mr.Spota. I wonder where this Muppet Man is now today.