PDA

View Full Version : Questions for Mr. Bush


BillyBorn
05-15-2003, 08:48 AM
Why did the lucrative school testing contracts, which are the main part funded from the "no child left behind" bill, get passed along to your cronies?

How many Enron executives have gone to jail?

Recently, a Fox News reporter was fired for refusing to report a lie. She sued for wrongful termination, but on appeal, the courts held that the United States has no law that requires news to be true. Do you support this opinion?

Mr. Bush has had several skin lesions removed from his face. Why is it, then, that he does not support environmental legislation that would help reduce skin cancer?

Why did George Bush Sr. give clemency to known terrorist Orlando Bosch, who admits to setting at l 40 bombs and blew up an airliner carrying 73 passengers?

Can you please explain why Mr. Bush thought an embezzler was an appropriate choice for a leadership position in Iraq?

Where are the WMD you promised us? (State of the Union speech, Jan. 2003: "25,000 liters of anthrax ... 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin ... materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent ... upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents ... several mobile biological weapons labs ... thousands of Iraqi security personnel ... at work hiding documents and materials from the U.N. inspectors."

You describe yourself as a military fighter pilot. Is it true that you were suspended from flying? Where were you in 1972?

Why did you shoot journalists in Iraq?

Who short sold United and American right before 9-11?

After Andrew Card notified you on 9-11 that America was under attack, why did you spend almost 20 minutes reading a story about a pet goat?

What are the plans to balance the social services spending in Iraq vs. in the United States?

Is it true that the tax cuts are actually a way to force changes in our social services infrastructure, eliminating the safety net and rolling back service to pre-FDR times?

Three times, you have stated that it would be easier to be a dictator. It's getting easier, don't you agree?

Why did you ask the president of Brazil if there are any blacks there?

Why did your administration lobby Tom Daschle to drop the investigation of 9-11?

Why haven't you let the public see the 800-page 9-11 investigation report?

Why do you overreact so to a little old lady like Helen Thomas, who has interviewed every president for 40 years?

When Florida was called for Gore, why did Mr. Bush insist that results were going to change?

How do you explain the worldwide animosity America now faces?

Why did you not take steps to protect the museums and nuclear power plants in Iraq?

If universal healthcare is important for Iraq, why not here?

Will you, Mr. Bush, take the tests that you require schoolchildren to pass?

Why did Bush tell the FBI to back off the bin laden family?

What will you do to make sure elections are properly audited in the next election?

Mr. Bush appears to have trouble slurring his words and has gin blossoms on his face. Has he resumed his substance abuse habits?

And why hasn't Worldcom been prosecuted for its 9 billion accounting fraud?

When Mr. Rumsfeld illustrates his words with a hand like a claw is he trying to remind us of that movie "Liar Liar" with Jim Carey?

I'd like to ask why Bush and Powell both cited a forged document as evidence of Iraq's alleged nuclear program, even though the C.I.A. told them it was a fake.

Why did NORAD deviate from Standard Operating Procedure on the morning of 9-11, failing to scramble jets?

Why did the administration deny that it was drafting a second Domestic Security Enhancement bill (Patriot Act II)?

With Homeland Security initiatives like First Responders bng under-funded how do you reason that creating more forgn enemies is making us any safer?

Why is it that $65 million was invested in investigating Clinton's penis, and $50 million allocated to investigate the Columbia shuttle disaster, yet only $3 million was allocated to investigate 9-11?

Why has the Justice Dept. consistently refused to supply information to Congress on how the USA PATRIOT Act is bng implemented, especially in light of the fact that passage of the act was conditional upon adequate oversight by Congress?

Why is Mr. Bush so anxious to seal records that are nearly 20 years old?

Why did the President renege on his campaign promise to support the Kyoto Treaty on global warming?

Where were you, Mr. Bush, between 1972 and 1973 when you were supposed to be in the national guard?

How do you justify the budget cuts for veterans benefits at precisely the time you are ramping up the military for permanent war?

Is it true that you are recruiting soldiers in Mexico?

What exactly did you mean when you referred to 9-11 as "hitting the trifecta?"

WHy did the White House start taking Cipro right after 9/11 and why didn't they advise the American people that an attack was imminent?

Why did anthrax only go to Democrats and media enemies?

Why doesn't the press ask and follow up on these questions?

"Just who the hell do you think you are?" in my most scolding tone of voice.

Mr. Bush has been reported as saying to a common man in Philadelphia, "who cares what you think?" Is this view of Mr. Bush's reserved for "little" people, or everyone?

Mr. Bush*, do you still "not give a damn" where Osama Bin Laden is?

Why have we relegated free speech to designated "First Amendment Zones?"

More importantly, why are people rounded up and arrested before protests, held without charges, and then released?

In 1989, you reportedly said that you are a media creation. Has anything changed?

Why have people started saying "be careful what you say?"

Why would Mr. Bush rather play golf on lushly watered greens in the desert than talk to citizens at a town meeting?

Why redact information about 9-11 by classifying it when it is on videotape and has already been printed in the newspaper?

Do you feel it is an abuse of power to classify 9-11 documents in order to avoid embarrassment for the administration about evidence that it failed to act?

On the morning of 9-11, why was Cheney hustled to a secure location while Bush was not?

Why is broadcasting knowingly false news legal in America but illegal in England?

Who exactly was with Cheney in his secret underground government? Rummy? Perle? Wolfowitz? Powell?

What is the LEGAL definition of a "shadow government?"

Is it true that it cost $800,000 to $1 million for the "Top Gun" photo op on the aircraft carrier?

What precisely did Bush mean when he promised a "humble forgn policy" while campaigning for president?

Would you trust the chastity belts for your twins if they had the same locking mechanism as your "lockbox" for Social Security

Where are the WMD?

Where are the WMD?

Where are the WMD?

Where are the WMD?

Where are the WMD?

Where are the WMD?

Skeptic
05-16-2003, 11:31 AM
I realize liberals love to keep posting these inane list of bogus questions and half (and non) truths, but one would be enough. The fact that they are pretty much ignored tells you how much they impress most people. Please spare us the bandwitdth.
________
headshops (http://headshop.net/)

BillyBorn
05-16-2003, 11:45 AM
They're ignored? Would that be because you can't answer them?

why
05-16-2003, 01:12 PM
When did you stop beating your wife?
________
sativa strains (http://strainindex.com)

Skeptic
05-16-2003, 04:20 PM
Quote:Recently, a Fox News reporter was fired for refusing to report a lie. She sued for wrongful termination, but on appeal, the courts held that the United States has no law that requires news to be true. Do you support this opinion?Well, for example, please name the REPORTER, when she was fired and what lie she refused to report. Then, show me the court decision where a judge (or panel) says the U.S. has no law requiring news to be true and which says that is the reason a lower court decision was reversed. You could also show what the lower court said (preferably in the court's words, not yours).

Posts like these are just too ridiculous to be given any credibility. I've gone too far already in responding.
________
extreme vaporizer (http://vaporizers.net/extreme-vaporizer)

NYURepublican
05-16-2003, 05:13 PM
The Fox affiliate fired the reporter because every time they asked her to substantiate her reporting or make minor changes she refused adamantly to do so. I've read the opinion in the case in question, and it's very murky, but from what I understand the court ruled that she did not have standing to allege the claim she was making under the FCC regulations because the regulations were too vague; thus, the case was thrown out. Nther Fox News Corp. nor Rupert Murdoch were even named as appellants in the suit, it was filed against the local media syndicate, and the court never made a factual determination about whether any news outlet had lied or not. This was a dense ruling that some reporter decided to spin the hell out of because he thought he could make FNC look bad, and liberals like Billy swallowed it hook, line, and sinker so they could add it to thr lists of bogus grievances and tinfoil hat conspiracy theories. If you wanna play that game I could ask some questions of your President Clinton, like "What happened to Vince Foster?", "Why'd you pass up the deal with the Sudanese government to take bin Laden into custody?", or "Why'd Susan Smith think it was more in her interest to go to jail rather than dish the dirt on you to Ken Starr?" Edited by: NYURepublican at: 5/16/03 10:53:11 pm

________
Live sex webshows (http://livesexwebshows.com/)

BillyBorn
05-16-2003, 07:54 PM
This post is ridiciulous apparently. This arrogance is unbelievable. Pick out the easy question and the rest is ridiculous. Well, that's how all the interviews with Bush are conducted anyway, so it's expected I suppose. I'm still waiting for the first reporter to ask Bush a difficult question, or perhaps better put, I'm still waiting for the first reporter to be allowed to ask Bush a difficult question.

Bush is not just detested by democrats and liberals you know, he is disliked by all people with common sense. (=all non-republicans and all non-americans) And why attack Clinton? I don't give a damn about Clinton. I'll support you. I'm attacking US forgn policy. I can't help it Bush screws up so often that even his domestic policy can't be ignored.

Why did Clinton bomb a pharmaceutical company in Sudan, causing hundred of thousands people to die from lack of medication, since this was yet another country suffering from sanctions and an embargo and only had 2 pharmaceutical companies. Combine these figures with the deaths following the Iraq sanctions and you have a multitude of the amount of people that Saddam and Bin Laden have killed together. Who are the bad guys?

And last of all, stop calling me a liberal. Call me a leftist if you want, but I'm not a liberal. It's become obvious that people here have no idea what liberalism and liberals stand for.

NYURepublican
05-17-2003, 10:14 AM
Wow, someone's really been taking his talking points from Noam Chomsky. While the Clinton attack on the pharmaceutical building was foolish, drawing a parallel between that event and 9/11 is ludicrous. First of all, intelligence reports at that time indicated that the building was likely a factory for chemical weapons. The attack was timed to occur at night so as to minimize the number of human casualties (unlike bin Laden's 9/11 attack which was timed so numerous people would be in the WTC); according to reports only a janitor was killed. Furthermore, there is absolutely zero evidence to prove that the destruction of the building caused deaths in the region to spiral upwards; NGO's like Doctors without Borders working in the Sudan at the time did not report any unusual increase in the death rate subsequent to the attack.

Give a damn rest, commie. Your anti-American agit-prop is based on lies and half- assed truths; most of the questions are directed to President Bush, even thought they have little or nothing to do with him (like the Fox News case). I've already debunked two of your contentions entirely and I don't care to waste my valuable time dealing with the rest. If you're so opposed to American forgn policy, leave the country and take up arms against us in Palestine or Cuba. Otherwise quit bitching, because you live in the freest, wealthiest country in the world, so free that you're allowed to spread anti-American lies and filth in public and the worst that will happen to you is you'll be exposed for what you are: a liar and an idiot. Edited by: NYURepublican at: 5/17/03 4:12:45 pm

________
The View (http://pattayaluxurycondos.com)

PoliticalAmbition
05-17-2003, 01:16 PM
HOLY COW!!!! A QUESTION MEANS 1 QUESTION, NOT WRITE A FRICKIN BOOK . GEEZ. I JUST AGED 10 YEARS READING THAT.

GET REAL
05-17-2003, 05:22 PM
Quote:Is it true that it cost $800,000 to $1 million for the "Top Gun" photo op on the aircraft carrier?Are you for real?? All it cost was about 20 minutes of jet fuel. Horsesarse Dems like to add the value of depreciation on the jet (already owned), the salary of the pilot and half the crew (who are already on the payroll), the salaries of air traffic controllers, etc. etc etc. The only additional cost to the taxpayers was a couple of hundred bucks for fuel. Period. AND most of that cost would have been the same for a helicopter, which the Dems say he should have used. What a bullpuckey argument. The Dems have no issues and are grasping at straws. These "questions" are all bullsheet.
________
Magic flight (http://www.vaporshop.com/mflb-vaporizer.html)

BillyBorn
05-19-2003, 01:10 AM
On the Sudan-attack. You call me an idiot and a liar (namecalling = sign of great intelligence), yet you say that there is zero evidence that the local deathtole has rissen. Are you blind? The attack prevented the country from creating chloroquine, which is used to cure malaria. The sanctions also prevented import, so tens of thousands of people (mostly children) died because of lack of medication. Had those kids been cured however, they would have probably just died because of starvation anyway (because of same sanctions). Maybe that's what Doctors without Borders were getting at (assuming they really said it, which I doubt)

Type in Sudan and Al Shifa (the "weapons factory") in a search engine and you find a countless number of links indicating what I stated. Maybe you could find one or two that support your statement. Quite weak.

But still I'm the liar? Oh please, stop ridiculing yourself.

NYURepublican
05-19-2003, 10:17 AM
Quote:The attack prevented the country from creating chloroquine, which is used to cure malaria.

Okay, prove me wrong. Find proof- testimony, medical records, articles, etc.- of the massive malaria outbreak that must have resulted. Don't you think that would have been news?

Quote:Maybe that's what Doctors without Borders were getting at (assuming they really said it, which I doubt)

Again, the facts are on my side. No one reported a surge in the death toll subsequent to the attack. You can try to squirm your way out of this fact all you like, to no avail.


Quote:Type in Sudan and Al Shifa (the "weapons factory&quot in a search engine and you find a countless number of links indicating what I stated.

I'm not playing search-engine games just to find websites that regurgitate the same Chomskyite nonsense that you're spouting. That doesn't constitute proof.


Quote:But still I'm the liar? Oh please, stop ridiculing yourself.

You are ther a liar or woefully misinformed. I'd suspect the latter, since it appears your ideology blinds you to anything except your narrow anti-American worldview. (The question arises again why you don't take up residency elsewhere and fight against the US if it's forgn policy is so hateful and evil). I rterate: the attack on the factory was made with faulty intel that suggested the building was a weapons factory. It was not done intentionally to destroy medicine etc.; it was done as a defensive maneuver in response to the terrorist bombing of US embassies (which killed many US and African individuals.) The strike (admittedly, ill-concved) was calculated to minimize the risk of civilian death. You are on shaky factual ground if you are citing this as an example of America's "terrorist" forgn policy; terrorist acts are designed to maximize, not minimize, the amount of casualties.

That's it for me; I've dealt with enough people like you to know that you never really change your mind, so rather than bang my head against the wall, I'll leave you to contemplate those facts and stew in your anti-American hatred while I continue leading a productive life, reaping the benefits of American freedom and capitalism. Free your mind.
Edited by: NYURepublican at: 5/19/03 3:47:47 pm

________
HERBALAIRE REVIEWS (http://www.vaporizers.net/)

Jim Glassman
05-19-2003, 11:00 AM
Run away and hide. People are sick and tired of the right wing hate-spew that stains these bulletin boards. Run away and hide. Cover your head.

MisterEd
05-22-2003, 01:41 AM
NUYRepublican

You are so full of sh*t, you could furtilize the whole third world. You accuse people of what you do yourself. Your "facts" are the ones you choose to believe out of convenience, the other ones become Chomskyite nonsense. The sad thing is you don't even realise it, yet you have this incredibly pretentious, arrogant now-it-all attitude.

Tu summarize: Hahahaha
________
star craft replays (http://screplays.com/)

Snarfy
05-22-2003, 03:45 AM
"Would you trust the chastity belts for your twins if they had the same locking mechanism as your "lockbox" for Social Security ?"

Would be like closing the barn door after the horse left.

But they're hot, so who cares.

I thought I'd keep my post on the same plane as our two major protagonists in this thread.

MisterEd
06-03-2003, 09:03 AM
Mmmmm.......... suddenly no replies anymore?

Figures....
________
FXX (http://www.ferrari-wiki.com/wiki/Ferrari_FXX)

Mylezylez
06-03-2003, 12:19 PM
I see posts like this everywhere. I find all of these questions quite relevant, and am shocked that not only does the government not even try to answer them, but the people on this board follow suit.

Here are some more questions.

What exactly are George W. Bush's financial connections to Osama bin Laden and Saudi Arabia?

I always found that an interesting one, since the united states has been going around, accusing so many other countries (even France, for god's sake!) of this very same thing. BUT, George W. Bush has shared money, lodging, and industry with the bin Ladens for decades. And not some distant relative of Osama (remember him by the way? He is the one accused of killing so many people in the world trade center).

Basically, our government now thinks it's above the law. Even worse, with that attitude, they are changing the laws to fit what rights THEY think we should have.

I thought the constitution and the bill of rights applied to EVERYONE. Not even just Americans.
________
Wendie 99 (http://www.lovelywendie99.com/)