I guess everyone's moticed...

[Mylezylez]

"The War" has started. And wow, it sure looks like self defence on our part. Soon Saddam, who was not a threat, and was never actually a threat, will no longer threaten us. And the survivors of Iraq can look forward to friendly US occupation, after our intense Blitzkrieg (which ominously has yet to happen). Speaking of "shock and awe", what other world leader, who was also elected through non-democratic means, enjoyed this type of military strategy?

Good Bless America. I guess the implication in that phrase is, God damn everyone else.

-Miles
________
Maine marijuana dispensaries (http://maine.dispensaries.org/)

[Mylezylez]

-Miles
________
LovelyWendie (http://www.lovelywendie99.com/)

[Skeptic]

Since when has anyone ever suggested that God Bless America means God Damn Everyone Else?? C'mon Miles. When someone sneezes and you say, "god bless you", are you telling everyone else they are damned?? When someone prays before a meal and asks God to 'bless this food', is the implication that God should damn all other food?? It really frustrates you that things are going well for the President and the USA right now, doesn't it, Miles? What is it, Miles, that makes you so bitter?

I know President Bush has disappointed you by holding back on the bombing since it seems so far not to be necessary. I know you were looking forward to grand expressions of condemnation of death and carnage. Well, once again, the President has disappointed you, Miles.
________
vaporizer reviews (http://vaporizers.net/vaporizers)

[Indecisive]

W and his buds have given the American people nothing but maybe/maybe nots.
Maybe Osama is responsible for the WTC, maybe not
Maybe Osama is in a cave, maybe not
Maybe Osama is dead, maybe not

Maybe Saddam is in cohoots w/Osama, maybe not
Maybe Saddam is using a body double, maybe not
Maybe Saddam is dead, maybe not

Maybe/Maybe not.

Maybe this serves to keep us (US citizens) fearful, uncertain and on W's side. maybe not

[Daddys war]

This is all bng done to settle a score for daddy bush...

[Skeptic]

It was very nice, then, for Bill Clinton to invent the policy of "regime change" and to be the first to use force against Iraq for non-compliance with UN Resolutions. Is he an adopted son of Bush Sr.?
________
medical marijuana news (http://potwire.com)

[Mylezylez]

This isn't about partisan politics (in my opinion). Democratic presidents have done thr fair share of misdeeds.

I do think though that our more modern Republican presidents are nuttier, and less able to deal with the fact that not everybody is Christian and middle to upper class.

And doesn't anybody think it's a bad idea for Bush to be preaching about how God on our side, when "our enemy" has an equal and opposite faith that God is on thr side. Is it the Crusades all over again?

-Miles
________
Upload Sc Replays (http://screplays.com/replays)

[mavsfan1341]

Miles,
The thing that gets me the most is the fact that if Bill Clinton was taking the exact actions that Bush is taking, you, along with every other Repulican hater would be backing him up like there was no tomorrow.

David Robinson said it best when he said, "History will speak of whether this is the right thing or the wrong thing," he said. "But right now, your guys are out there fighting, so support them. There's plenty of time for commentary later."
end quote*

And even if you don't support taking actions of war against Iraq, remember you have men and women dying for your freedom. You have the right to your opinion because that is why this country is so wonderful. If you were an Iraqi, you could be killed for the comments that you have made. Hopefully, some day very soon, Iraqi's will also have the right to openly express thr opinions as we do.

"No matter what your stance is - if your support this war or you don't - when it comes down to it, you have to support the troops that we have over there," Kobe Bryant of the Lakers said. end quote*

The war has begun, there is nothing that you can do to stop it. You can continue to protest and debate, but remember that your right to do so has been and is currently bng paid for by the courage of our soldiers.

[Promilitary]

I do support the troops. Especially those friends and family members who are currently in Iraq and other parts of the world. I wish them all safety and godspeed. I even wish them success since the alternative is far worse.

I do NOT support this administration or its actions. Not domestically or internationally. These bumbling boobs have caused far more harm than good and more is yet to come. It is a patriotic act to call this administration on its lies.

Waiting until the war is over to comment is like waiting for the burglar to empty the house before calling the police. Sure you can investigate, but you can never truly right the wrong.

Let's hope we win this soon and bring everyone home. Then we can look towards removing this simpleton from the White House in 2004.

[Mylezylez]

I really don't see how the American troops in Iraq are fighting for my freedom. So far, it seems like the war on terrorism, both Patriot Acts, and a variety of other new security laws do a pretty good job of violating privacy, free speech, and in general do little but make the lives of many Americans more difficult.

Will the war in Iraq motivate "our leaders" to repeal some of these awful laws? I seriously doubt it. So I feel this war actually works AGAINST freedom.

But don't you dare suggest I don't care about the lives of American (and Iraqi, for that matter) troops. You, the pro-war public are the ones who want to send them to a forgn land to die for VERY questionable reasons. I assure you, most (you can never speak for all of anybody) anti-war protesters want nothing more than to bring American troops home safe and sound, and without any more loss of life.

But, you will probably continue to believe that I (and others who think somewhat like me) are destroying our god-fearing country.

-Miles
________
SLAVELATINA4U (http://www.girlcamfriend.com/cam/slavelatina4u/)

[mavsfan1341]

YES, for YOUR freedom!!
I guess your decision would be to just sit back and wait for the terrorists that Saddam supports to try to blow the US off the map. Or we could have done what Clinton did and shoot a missle or two the terrorists way and consider that as scaring them off.
Our country was seen as militarily weak during the Clinton era. Clinton did absolutely nothing to strengthen our military while he was in office; actually, he worked against our forces.
It is well known, even among anti-war groups, that Saddam is a very evil man that supports a radical Anti-American point of view. The decisions that are bng made and the actions that our country is taking are most definitely protecting American citizens from another major catastrophy. And if in the meantime we're freng the Iraqi citizens from slavery to Saddams dictatorship, well, that's even more reason to support these actions. So, yes, our military is most definitely fighting for your freedom.

[Mylezylez]

Where is this paranoia about terrorists blowing the US off the map coming from?

IF you are referring to September 11th, then you should know that 15 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, a country that has strong financial ties to the US. Remember them, they're the country that's NOT Iraq.

If we're talking about responsibility, then I'd give Saudi Arabia an 8 on a scale of 1 to 10.

But do we want to be the kind of country that's constantly paranoid about terrorism, and using that to wage war against most of the world?

Well I've got news for you, you aer FAR more likely to die of cancer from all the pollution in the air, than to die from a terrorist attack.

My advice is that if you want to stop Islamic terrorism against the United States, than the US should stop pissing off most of the arab world!

-Miles
________
Body science (http://bodyscience.ws/)

[Promilitary]

No one's going to "blow us off the map".

Using your "threat" logic, why aren't we attacking North Korea, Iran and France ( ) as well?

We should be invading "friends" like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Egypt and the UAE in order to free thr people from "slavery".

There are good reasons to go after Hussn. You haven't mentioned any of them. Get off your jingoistic horse and smell what you're dropping.

As for Clinton's weakness, military matters were not his strong suit, but he did save Bosnia/Herzegovina and Kosovo. And everyone I know had a job when he was president.