View Full Version : Kate Murray; Will Someone Reel Her In?
Richard Belkins
03-13-2006, 11:13 PM
What's up with this official?
Why does she insist on wasting our funds by mailing us literature with her fat face plastered all over the mailing. Her recent mailing has four pages and displays her pic FIVE friggin' times.
Who the hell voted for this narcissist?
Those dependent on TOH patronage and single digit IQs.
I think they are one in the same.
It's pretty difficult to harpoon a whale and bring it to shore.
County Executive Murray. Get used to the sound of that tune boys!
County Executive Murray. Get used to the sound of that tune boys!
Are you the same person that said we had to get used to "County Executive Peterson?"
About 100,000 people voted for her. And you people really need a better talking point. This thing with the mailings hasnt worked for you ever before, and it isnt working now. People like to get information about what their Town is doing. If this is the best you have, it is a pretty sorry state of affairs for your party.
Look no further than your $%$^&$& TOH and County tax bill.
Conventioneer2006
03-15-2006, 01:45 AM
Here's on eline you WON'T hear on May31st from the Repugnican Spin Machine:
"thank you once again for that introduction, it's great to be here in Hempstead Town, where the Supervisor was re-elected with a 100,000 votes... that's siginificant because the TOH has more than 700,000 residents, and that means six out of seven residents DIDN'T vote for her."
hahahahahahaha
Yea, that really shows your intelect. When 23% of registered voters actually go to the polls, 100,000 is a very strong number. This past November Supervisor Murray got approx. 60% of the votes.
Go tell your BS lines elsewhere
Yea, that really shows your intelect. When 23% of registered voters actually go to the polls, 100,000 is a very strong number. This past November Supervisor Murray got approx. 60% of the votes.
Go tell your BS lines elsewhere
First of all, Murray only got 59%. :P
More importantly, regardless of whether its a "good political issue" or not, excessive taxpayer-funded mailings are a huge waste of government funds. Its important to keep people notified, but to do so on full color, expensive, fancy mailings that waste millions of dollars is utter stupidy. It shouldn't be a political issue - it should just be stopped.
What about Tommy Boy??
03-15-2006, 06:28 PM
First of all, Murray only got 59%. :P
More importantly, regardless of whether its a "good political issue" or not, excessive taxpayer-funded mailings are a huge waste of government funds. Its important to keep people notified, but to do so on full color, expensive, fancy mailings that waste millions of dollars is utter stupidy. It shouldn't be a political issue - it should just be stopped.
Lets talk about the real issue of Sir Tommy campaining on out tax dollars. Who do you think is footing the bill for all of his "conferences"???? Get a grip dems..........
Dollars and sense
03-16-2006, 01:19 AM
Maybe if the mailings were done over the course of the regular work day, I could see them making sense, barely. To pay these clowns overtime to do it is just ridiculous.................
vBulletin® v3.6.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.