View Full Version : Why isn't anyone talking about C-6 Zoning litigation?
Madhattr
07-07-2005, 08:45 AM
Why was the previous post regarding the Town Board's recent passage of Local Law allowing MULTIPLE apartments over EVERY SINGLE commercial storefront (C-6 zone) in Huntington removed from this site?
Why isn't anyone discussing the horrendous, overwhelming negative impact - TOWNWIDE - that this will have on all of us as to traffic, sewage and water, schools, parking, etc?
Doesn't anyone care that they completely ignored - for political reasons - the statutory mandates of SEQRA (requiring environmental review and assessment of such acts impacting environment)?
How long can these thugs continue to get away with this kind of arrogance, and when will you people speak out - after it's too late - and all of Huntington looks like Jericho Tpk in Syosset?
Come on people - let's get together and speak out!!!
saw Binder's press conference about it - not much press, and the media isn't doing ANYTHING to get it out in front of the public where it belongs - WHY NOT?
Binder's Yarmulke
07-07-2005, 09:30 AM
All aboard!
answer is clear
07-07-2005, 09:52 AM
this website like our only newspaper newsday is pro democrat
the dems need Huntington and Babylon so they joined forces to squelch any bad news about overcrowding and apartments being built
they have a lock on this website and on Newsday
the public for the most part is left in the dark and thats the way the Dems want it
Huntington Carpenters
07-12-2005, 08:50 AM
Huntington Carpenters are Rapists BEWARE :twisted:
Yeah I saw
07-12-2005, 01:51 PM
read that A--H--- newsrag Newsday
said rapist and sexual abuser was a Huntington Carpenter
Paper never explained He Was from Guatemala illegally in this country
also never explained that the woman who Wasn't raped was Brutally Mutilated With a Boxcutter
WAS THIS A HATE CRIME NEWSDAY? I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF IT WERE! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
perhaps the general population of Huntingotn is not as concerned about the C-6 Zoning change as you are.
perhaps the general population of Huntingotn is not as concerned about the C-6 Zoning change as you are.
************************************************** ***
3/4 of voting population of Huntington don't even know it took place
Newsday and some lefties in some churches want to place illegal aliens in some of these apartments
town is being destroyed and population is reserved that nothing can be done about it
corruption reigns supreme :twisted:
xxx xxx
07-13-2005, 08:03 AM
Once again we've been F**ked buy the Leadership choices.
u bet
07-13-2005, 09:38 AM
Once again we've been F**ked buy the Leadership choices.
they picked Capodanno once didn't they
what a mistake that turned out to be
just like Petrone
it's my way or no way :twisted:
Once again we've been F**ked buy the Leadership choices.
they picked Capodanno once didn't they
what a mistake that turned out to be
just like Petrone
it's my way or no way :twisted:
EXCELLENT POST
Big Win For Park Ave
07-27-2005, 11:47 PM
Judge orders an injunction against town on apartments over stores in C-6 zones- :D
Judge orders an injunction against town on apartments over stores in C-6 zones- :D
For those of you interested in the C-6 lawsuit against the Town of Huntington (challenging Frank and the Board's illegal amendment to the Town Code allowing multiple apartments over EACH AND EVERY every commercial space in a C-6 zone), an injunction has been granted by Judge Pitts against the Town prohibiting it from accepting, entertaining or granting any building permits under the new code.
See folks, attorneys actually can serve a useful purpose in society - and some actually do the right thing (no, it's not always about the money).
why haven't we heard anyhting about this?
It's BIG news!!
obviously not
08-02-2005, 03:37 PM
why haven't we heard anyhting about this?
It's BIG news!!
Must have more support in the town than was thought. Or the town really doesn;t care about this.
media wants apartments
08-02-2005, 04:36 PM
Newsday and the electronic media want apartment buildings cause it will bring in large number of people
thereby increasing demand for media and higher profits
the rich get even wealthier and the communities get
crime congestion pollution noise traffic brownouts and so on
plus little left that resembles Long Island Suburbs
Madhatter
08-04-2005, 09:15 AM
If you live in Huntington, you should be extremely concerned about the local law recently passed by OUR Town Board DOUBLING the number of apartments allowed over EACH AND EVERY COMMERCIAL STORE IN THE ENTIRE TOWN - WITHOUT CONDUCTING THE REQUIRED SEQRA (environmental) Review to discern the potential negative impacts this change will have upon the Town and us as citizens (e.g., parking, traffic, sewage/water, schools and buses, etc).
It is critical that you all speak out and stand up against this blatant disregard for us, our town, and our children. Think about the negative impact of hundreds, if not thousands of new apartments sprinkled across our already congested town (Rt 110, Jericho, Larkfield Road, etc.) - with absolutely no concern for the consequences.
DON'T YOU CARE?
Town Destroys Civics
08-04-2005, 12:05 PM
YES WE CARE!
The town government is run by officials who favor the businesses side to government.
Look what has happened all over Huntington, congestion so bad you think your in a major city or even a third world country.
Chamber of commerce has brought the civic groups to their knees.
And the town officials have helped along the way.
SIERRA CLUB FOOLS
08-17-2005, 11:42 PM
YES WE CARE!
The town government is run by officials who favor the businesses side to government.
Look what has happened all over Huntington, congestion so bad you think your in a major city or even a third world country.
Chamber of commerce has brought the civic groups to their knees.
And the town officials have helped along the way.
Deceptive Mailing on Steep Slopes
Most of you may have also found, in your mail today, a two page letter from an otherwise-unidentified group called "SOS - Slope Ordinance Solutions for Huntington."
You should, first of all, note that this was a very professional mailing, with sophisticated imprinted names and addresses, and it was sent Presorted First Class, so we are probably talking about thousands of dollars in postage alone, not counting the cost to create, print, stuff, and deliver the mailings to the various post offices serving communities in the Town of Huntington.
Who has that kind of money to spend?
Individuals like you and me? Of course not.
Or how about true historical civic associations in the Town of Huntington? No, our civics only wish they had access to money like this.
No, this is a well-financed campaign, favoring the special interests in our Town. At a Public Hearing that I attended last year, when this concept of a Steep Slope ordinance amendment was first proposed, I witnessed a gathering of the powerful interests favoring continued outrageous development in the Town of Huntington, including high-powered land use attorneys, developers, land owners, land speculators, and construction unions, and very few voices of individual citizens or civic associations.
When a second Public Hearing was held a few months ago, the developers and their friends were outgunned by individual citizens, civic associations (from all over the Town), and environmental organizations, whose voices had been absent at the hearing a year or so prior. Nobody but the rich and powerful developers knew about the topic, when it was originally raised, but word spread when the amendment was refined, and the last hearing had all of Huntington aware, and able to attend and express support for this measure.
Contrary to what this well-financed group has said in their mailing, the Proposed Steep Slope Law amendment will not harm property values in the Town of Huntington, but it will limit outrageous development in inappropriate places. Indeed, if outrageous development were allowed to continue in Huntington, that is precisely what would ruin property values for you and me.
The law will not prevent home owners from building sensible additions to their properties, but it will prevent such outrageous projects as the carve-out of the hillside on Park Avenue (just south of Dunlop Road) that sickens everyone who sees it. I understand, from comments at the last Public Hearing on this proposed amendment, that there is a similar outrageous development on Bread and Cheese Hollow Road, but I have not personally witnessed that one.
This secretive group has asked that people write to the Town Board to express opposition to the proposed Steep Slope Law. Instead of following their bidding, which would promote the interests of developers and powerful land owners in Huntington, I would urge that you instead E-mail the five members of the Town Board to indicate your support of the proposed Law.
Don't be conned by secretive or deceptive mailings.
Please send your comments to:
Supervisor and the Town Board Members
fpetrone@town.huntington.ny.us [Frank Petrone, Supervisor]
sberland@town.huntington.ny.us [Susan Berland, Councilwoman]
mbudd@town.huntington.ny.us [Marlene Budd, Councilwoman]
mcapodanno@town.huntington.ny.us [Mark Capodanno, Councilman]
mcuthbertson@town.huntington.ny.us [Mark Cuthbertson, Councilman]
Planning Board and Planning Department
planning@town.huntington.ny.us
Let's take back our Town for its residents, and not let the developers and special interests destroy what we treasure.
Jerry Hannon
if slumlords talked
08-20-2005, 03:55 PM
YES WE CARE!
The town government is run by officials who favor the businesses side to government.
Look what has happened all over Huntington, congestion so bad you think your in a major city or even a third world country.
Chamber of commerce has brought the civic groups to their knees.
And the town officials have helped along the way.
Deceptive Mailing on Steep Slopes
Most of you may have also found, in your mail today, a two page letter from an otherwise-unidentified group called "SOS - Slope Ordinance Solutions for Huntington."
You should, first of all, note that this was a very professional mailing, with sophisticated imprinted names and addresses, and it was sent Presorted First Class, so we are probably talking about thousands of dollars in postage alone, not counting the cost to create, print, stuff, and deliver the mailings to the various post offices serving communities in the Town of Huntington.
Who has that kind of money to spend?
Individuals like you and me? Of course not.
Or how about true historical civic associations in the Town of Huntington? No, our civics only wish they had access to money like this.
No, this is a well-financed campaign, favoring the special interests in our Town. At a Public Hearing that I attended last year, when this concept of a Steep Slope ordinance amendment was first proposed, I witnessed a gathering of the powerful interests favoring continued outrageous development in the Town of Huntington, including high-powered land use attorneys, developers, land owners, land speculators, and construction unions, and very few voices of individual citizens or civic associations.
When a second Public Hearing was held a few months ago, the developers and their friends were outgunned by individual citizens, civic associations (from all over the Town), and environmental organizations, whose voices had been absent at the hearing a year or so prior. Nobody but the rich and powerful developers knew about the topic, when it was originally raised, but word spread when the amendment was refined, and the last hearing had all of Huntington aware, and able to attend and express support for this measure.
Contrary to what this well-financed group has said in their mailing, the Proposed Steep Slope Law amendment will not harm property values in the Town of Huntington, but it will limit outrageous development in inappropriate places. Indeed, if outrageous development were allowed to continue in Huntington, that is precisely what would ruin property values for you and me.
The law will not prevent home owners from building sensible additions to their properties, but it will prevent such outrageous projects as the carve-out of the hillside on Park Avenue (just south of Dunlop Road) that sickens everyone who sees it. I understand, from comments at the last Public Hearing on this proposed amendment, that there is a similar outrageous development on Bread and Cheese Hollow Road, but I have not personally witnessed that one.
This secretive group has asked that people write to the Town Board to express opposition to the proposed Steep Slope Law. Instead of following their bidding, which would promote the interests of developers and powerful land owners in Huntington, I would urge that you instead E-mail the five members of the Town Board to indicate your support of the proposed Law.
Don't be conned by secretive or deceptive mailings.
Please send your comments to:
Supervisor and the Town Board Members
fpetrone@town.huntington.ny.us [Frank Petrone, Supervisor]
sberland@town.huntington.ny.us [Susan Berland, Councilwoman]
mbudd@town.huntington.ny.us [Marlene Budd, Councilwoman]
mcapodanno@town.huntington.ny.us [Mark Capodanno, Councilman]
mcuthbertson@town.huntington.ny.us [Mark Cuthbertson, Councilman]
Planning Board and Planning Department
planning@town.huntington.ny.us
Let's take back our Town for its residents, and not let the developers and special interests destroy what we treasure.
Jerry Hannon
Think of the BackrooM meetings Petrone and Christensen And Sneden have Had with RealEstate interests and local GOvernment officials :twisted:
vBulletin® v3.6.5, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.