Todays story to ponder

[I need some answers pleas]

My friends uncles' neighbors' cousins' aunts' brothers' coworker has a problem. He is obsessed with finding stories on the web of dicey situations involving a arrest and a possible violation of the law, civil rights, or just ethics of the Police officer involved.
What he will do is find a police message board and pretend to be a relative or a significant other, of the arrestee in the story and ask for help. While he is doing this he usually cross dresses and uses chinese herbs ground up as a body rub.
Well apparently one of the stories he used has a trademark attached to it, the one about being a women and beating his daughter and cops kicking in his door and arresting him/her for resisting. Then getting the plunger treatment at 1st District ct.
The person who originally owned the story has filed a trademark infringement violation of the labor law section 209. Heres the question; He lives in Canada, the person who owns the story lives in Talahassee,(its not her, shes a wanna be) can a public safety officer from Highlands falls, thats a small city right next to talahassee, the tal. police were too busy, drive up to Canada, kick in his door beat him senseless with his own bird feeder, cuff and hogtie him and drive him back to Talahassee in his trunk, without stopping for food or rest, and then charging him for a nuiscance violation because he pooped and peed in his trunk?

[chatti-patti]

yes, in fact he may face intrastate defecation charges and interpol may get involved if there was any urination as he crossed the border into America.
Your buddy is screwed, now stop posting garbage here, Without authority of Council of the real trolls of Long Island. Next time either me or County Resident must approve your post

[Dr. Skidmore]

He is obsessed with finding stories on the web because he pooped and peed in his trunk?

1. Feldberg, M. (1985). Gratuities, Corruption and the Democratic Ethos of Policing: The Case of the Free Cup of Coffee, Moral Issues in Police Work. F. Elliston & M. Feldberg.
2. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
3. Feldberg, M. (1985). Gratuities, Corruption and the Democratic Ethos of Policing: The Case of the Free Cup of Coffee, Moral Issues in Police Work. F. Elliston & M. Feldberg.
4. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
5. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
6. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
7. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
8. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
9. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
10. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
11. Wesylan College Faculty, NC. (2004, January 6). Police Deviance and Ethics.
12. Wesylan College Faculty, NC. (2004, January 6). Police Deviance and Ethics.
13. Sherman, L. (1974). Police Corruption: A Sociological Perspective. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
14. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement. .
15. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities., Centre
For Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.

[Unlawful Gratuities]

1. Feldberg, M. (1985). Gratuities, Corruption and the Democratic Ethos of Policing: The Case of the Free Cup of Coffee, Moral Issues in Police Work. F. Elliston & M. Feldberg.
2. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
3. Feldberg, M. (1985). Gratuities, Corruption and the Democratic Ethos of Policing: The Case of the Free Cup of Coffee, Moral Issues in Police Work. F. Elliston & M. Feldberg.
4. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
5. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
6. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
7. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
8. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
9. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
10. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
11. Wesylan College Faculty, NC. (2004, January 6). Police Deviance and Ethics.
12. Wesylan College Faculty, NC. (2004, January 6). Police Deviance and Ethics.
13. Sherman, L. (1974). Police Corruption: A Sociological Perspective. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
14. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement. .
15. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities., Centre
For Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.



Are you saying the public safety officer got a free cup of coffee and gave it to him and thats why he peed the trunk?

[200.35]

There is no articles involving public safety officers and free coffee huh?

[Supreme Court Justice]

1. Feldberg, M. (1985). Gratuities, Corruption and the Democratic Ethos of Policing: The Case of the Free Cup of Coffee, Moral Issues in Police Work. F. Elliston & M. Feldberg.
2. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
3. Feldberg, M. (1985). Gratuities, Corruption and the Democratic Ethos of Policing: The Case of the Free Cup of Coffee, Moral Issues in Police Work. F. Elliston & M. Feldberg.
4. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
5. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
6. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
7. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
8. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
9. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
10. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
11. Wesylan College Faculty, NC. (2004, January 6). Police Deviance and Ethics.
12. Wesylan College Faculty, NC. (2004, January 6). Police Deviance and Ethics.
13. Sherman, L. (1974). Police Corruption: A Sociological Perspective. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
14. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement. .
15. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities., Centre
For Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.



We find your post invalid since it has nothing to do with anything and we strip you of your doctorship, now get out of our court


_________________
"It's all about denial..."

[A.Skidmore]

He is obsessed with finding stories on the web because he pooped and peed in his trunk?
Yes too much free coffee can lead to one's peeing oneself especially on a cross country trip without a potty break

[It's all about denial...]

Dr. Skidmore
I knew sooner or later we'd flush out the rabbit
Now we know whos been posting all the ''ethical'' dilemma stories, very transparent, lame try, guess you had to try something new, didnt work out too well.
you still are a joke

[Im no expert but.........]

Isnt there some kind of constitutional right if you are being transported in the trunk of a car, to stop for a powder room break?
If Ias him I'd sue that public safety numnuts.

Isnt there some kind of constitutional right if you are being transported in the trunk of a car, to stop for a powder room break?
If Ias him I'd sue that public safety numnuts.
No, because it was a transport from Canada to Florida.
There are no rules governing a public safety officer in Florida, they are like the sheriffs in the Ole West, anything goes once they cross into Canada. Had it been a Texas public safety officer He would have had to stop every 2.3 kilometers in Canada, and every 5 miles in the U.S.

[Bugs B.]

Dr. Skidmore
I knew sooner or later we'd flush out the rabbit

If you don't mind violating federal and state DEC regs, you can flush all you want.

Just don't be shooting at the wiley wittle wabbit. By law, my homeboy is protected from dusk on Feb 21 up until dawn on Nov 1.

Dr. Skidmore
I knew sooner or later we'd flush out the rabbit

If you don't mind violating federal and state DEC regs, you can flush all you want.

Just don't be shooting at the wiley wittle wabbit. By law, my homeboy is protected from dusk on Feb 21 up until dawn on Nov 1.
Right you are forgetting the loophole where rabbits endangering a cash crop may be popped on sight.
Or ones that appear rabid.
Sometimes I hook my fence up to a outlet and run a grid of electricity thru it.
And of course once dat tricky rabbit enters a roadway....free game

[peter cottontail]

Dr. Skidmore
I knew sooner or later we'd flush out the rabbit

If you don't mind violating federal and state DEC regs, you can flush all you want.

Just don't be shooting at the wiley wittle wabbit. By law, my homeboy is protected from dusk on Feb 21 up until dawn on Nov 1.
Right you are forgetting the loophole where rabbits endangering a cash crop may be popped on sight.
Or ones that appear rabid.
Sometimes I hook my fence up to a outlet and run a grid of electricity thru it.
And of course once dat tricky rabbit enters a roadway....free game
Or of course in self defense

Dr. Skidmore
I knew sooner or later we'd flush out the rabbit

If you don't mind violating federal and state DEC regs, you can flush all you want.

Just don't be shooting at the wiley wittle wabbit. By law, my homeboy is protected from dusk on Feb 21 up until dawn on Nov 1.
Right you are forgetting the loophole where rabbits endangering a cash crop may be popped on sight.
Or ones that appear rabid.
Sometimes I hook my fence up to a outlet and run a grid of electricity thru it.
And of course once dat tricky rabbit enters a roadway....free game
Or of course in self defense
or in the defense of others

C'mon you schiesters, Im running out of ink printing all this nonsence. Never know when it'll come in handy :lol:

C'mon you schiesters, Im running out of ink printing all this nonsence. Never know when it'll come in handy :lol:
ok how do you spell nonsense?

OK hot shot you won the spelling bee. Must've made your day :lol:

OK hot shot you won the spelling bee. Must've made your day :lol:
People in glass houses shouldnt throw stones, you are very critical of others meanwhile your telltale sign of posting is your horrible grammar

People in glass houses shouldnt throw stones, you are very critical of others meanwhile your telltale sign of posting is your horrible grammar

I was merely pointing out that another poster who claimed to be a "women" could not have been because he misspelled woman. Call it what you want. And I don't judge anyone unless they cast stones at me.

However, if I had to size up county employee's, I'd say they're a group of ruthless individuals pissing the TAXPAYER'S money away harrassing others on chat boards.

Poor grammar? I highly doubt it since I aced English 101.

However, if I had to size up county employee's, I'd say they're a group of ruthless individuals pissing the TAXPAYER'S money away harrassing others on chat
what exactly are you doing? enlightening the world?
Or just making a fool of yourself

People in glass houses shouldnt throw stones, you are very critical of others meanwhile your telltale sign of posting is your horrible grammar

I was merely pointing out that another poster who claimed to be a "women" could not have been because he misspelled woman. Call it what you want. And I don't judge anyone unless they cast stones at me.

However, if I had to size up county employee's, I'd say they're a group of ruthless individuals pissing the TAXPAYER'S money away harrassing others on chat boards.

Poor grammar? I highly doubt it since I aced English 101.
What in 5th grade in 1914?

Tuff titty. Becuase I (unlike you) can do anything I want, when I want. Your bosses and laws don't pertain to me.

Tuff titty. Becuase I (unlike you) can do anything I want, when I want. Your bosses and laws don't pertain to me.
right that the best part of being mentally incompetent, huh?
not responsible for your own actions? Can piss yourself whenever you want?thats great
I'm so happy for you

right that the best part of being mentally incompetent, huh?
not responsible for your own actions? Can piss yourself whenever you want?thats great
I'm so happy for you

If you say so. Statistics claim law enf. are known for spousal abuse & divorce, drugs, alcoholism. Why would I want anyone like that?

right that the best part of being mentally incompetent, huh?
not responsible for your own actions? Can piss yourself whenever you want?thats great
I'm so happy for you

If you say so. Statistics claim law enf. are known for spousal abuse & divorce, drugs, alcoholism. Why would I want anyone like that?
You mean why would you want anyone, you cant even get along with your own family, let alone a stranger.
And really now, what decent minded cop would go within 100 yards of you with all your baggage, divorce, child abuse, no life, and you resisted arrest, ha can you imagine what a uproar it would be if you showed up at a scpd function, give it a rest loser, no sane man would touch that garbage, as you well know.

right that the best part of being mentally incompetent, huh?
not responsible for your own actions? Can piss yourself whenever you want?thats great
I'm so happy for you

If you say so. Statistics claim law enf. are known for spousal abuse & divorce, drugs, alcoholism. Why would I want anyone like that?
You mean why would you want anyone, you cant even get along with your own family, let alone a stranger.
And really now, what decent minded cop would go within 100 yards of you with all your baggage, divorce, child abuse, no life, and you resisted arrest, ha can you imagine what a uproar it would be if you showed up at a scpd function, give it a rest loser, no sane man would touch that garbage, as you well know.
patti is starting to sound like a disgruntled cop groupie thats been locked up for beating her kids and fighting the law

[chatti-patti]

right that the best part of being mentally incompetent, huh?
not responsible for your own actions? Can piss yourself whenever you want?thats great
I'm so happy for you

If you say so. Statistics claim law enf. are known for spousal abuse & divorce, drugs, alcoholism. Why would I want anyone like that?
You mean why would you want anyone, you cant even get along with your own family, let alone a stranger.
And really now, what decent minded cop would go within 100 yards of you with all your baggage, divorce, child abuse, no life, and you resisted arrest, ha can you imagine what a uproar it would be if you showed up at a scpd function, give it a rest loser, no sane man would touch that garbage, as you well know.
patti is starting to sound like a disgruntled cop groupie thats been locked up for beating her kids and fighting the law
I only beat one of my kids,ok? and so what I love men in uniforms, I only wish one would love me back...sigh did i mention I'm vivacious?

[sick of patti]

yipes, it sounds like patti and her scpd lover are having online squabbles. here's an idea guys...if you want her to go away....don't take the bait...don't answer. personally, i'm really, REALLY sick of her.

yipes, it sounds like patti and her scpd lover are having online squabbles. here's an idea guys...if you want her to go away....don't take the bait...don't answer. personally, i'm really, REALLY sick of her.
She'll be gone for a while, enjoy the peace

[chatti patti]

Im back fresh out of the fat farm, 40 lbs lighter :wink:

[Guesswho]

My friends uncles' neighbors' cousins' aunts' brothers' coworker has a problem. He is obsessed with finding stories on the web of dicey situations involving a arrest and a possible violation of the law, civil rights, or just ethics of the Police officer involved.
What he will do is find a police message board and pretend to be a relative or a significant other, of the arrestee in the story and ask for help. While he is doing this he usually cross dresses and uses chinese herbs ground up as a body rub.
Well apparently one of the stories he used has a trademark attached to it, the one about being a women and beating his daughter and cops kicking in his door and arresting him/her for resisting. Then getting the plunger treatment at 1st District ct.
The person who originally owned the story has filed a trademark infringement violation of the labor law section 209. Heres the question; He lives in Canada, the person who owns the story lives in Talahassee,(its not her, shes a wanna be) can a public safety officer from Highlands falls, thats a small city right next to talahassee, the tal. police were too busy, drive up to Canada, kick in his door beat him senseless with his own bird feeder, cuff and hogtie him and drive him back to Talahassee in his trunk, without stopping for food or rest, and then charging him for a nuiscance violation because he pooped and peed in his trunk?

How about this one for fodder...Cops bust in...Eyeball a silver object...Think it's a knife but it's only a spoon...Beat the S H I T out of the guy so much he's loses a nut...And in the end he sues... Gets 400 grand for a lost nut...That should make him happy

[how about not]

My friends uncles' neighbors' cousins' aunts' brothers' coworker has a problem. He is obsessed with finding stories on the web of dicey situations involving a arrest and a possible violation of the law, civil rights, or just ethics of the Police officer involved.
What he will do is find a police message board and pretend to be a relative or a significant other, of the arrestee in the story and ask for help. While he is doing this he usually cross dresses and uses chinese herbs ground up as a body rub.
Well apparently one of the stories he used has a trademark attached to it, the one about being a women and beating his daughter and cops kicking in his door and arresting him/her for resisting. Then getting the plunger treatment at 1st District ct.
The person who originally owned the story has filed a trademark infringement violation of the labor law section 209. Heres the question; He lives in Canada, the person who owns the story lives in Talahassee,(its not her, shes a wanna be) can a public safety officer from Highlands falls, thats a small city right next to talahassee, the tal. police were too busy, drive up to Canada, kick in his door beat him senseless with his own bird feeder, cuff and hogtie him and drive him back to Talahassee in his trunk, without stopping for food or rest, and then charging him for a nuiscance violation because he pooped and peed in his trunk?

How about this one for fodder...Cops bust in...Eyeball a silver object...Think it's a knife but it's only a spoon...Beat the S H I T out of the guy so much he's loses a nut...And in the end he sues... Gets 400 grand for a lost nut...That should make him happy
Pretty lame, to begin with a nut is worth more like a million, but the story isnt funny, creative or worth ready

[Guesswho]

[/quote] How about this one for fodder...Cops bust in...Eyeball a silver object...Think it's a knife but it's only a spoon...Beat the S H I T out of the guy so much he's loses a nut...And in the end he sues... Gets 400 grand for a lost nut...That should make him happy[/quote] Pretty lame, to begin with a nut is worth more like a million, but the story isnt funny, creative or worth ready[/quote]

Nothing funny about it...Just basic facts and true...As for a nut being worth more like a million...Don't flatter yourself.

How about this one for fodder...Cops bust in...Eyeball a silver object...Think it's a knife but it's only a spoon...Beat the S H I T out of the guy so much he's loses a nut...And in the end he sues... Gets 400 grand for a lost nut...That should make him happy[/quote] Pretty lame, to begin with a nut is worth more like a million, but the story isnt funny, creative or worth ready[/quote]

Nothing funny about it...Just basic facts and true...As for a nut being worth more like a million...Don't flatter yourself.[/quote]So? Who cares stupid pointless story, "a guy loses his nut, sues.Yay thanks for sharing"
No in reality, 1 lost testicle for a young 18-28 year old is worth over 1 million, 28-35 y/o 900- 1 million, 35-42y/o 600-900, etc. If your story is true, the guy got screwed, but what was the p/c for ''bust in'' was it a domestic assault on a 19 y/o daughter? Did the guy resist arrest? Was the guy's name patrick? :roll: :roll:

[Guesswho]

How about this one for fodder...Cops bust in...Eyeball a silver object...Think it's a knife but it's only a spoon...Beat the S H I T out of the guy so much he's loses a nut...And in the end he sues... Gets 400 grand for a lost nut...That should make him happy Pretty lame, to begin with a nut is worth more like a million, but the story isnt funny, creative or worth ready[/quote]

Nothing funny about it...Just basic facts and true...As for a nut being worth more like a million...Don't flatter yourself.[/quote]So? Who cares stupid pointless story, "a guy loses his nut, sues.Yay thanks for sharing"
No in reality, 1 lost testicle for a young 18-28 year old is worth over 1 million, 28-35 y/o 900- 1 million, 35-42y/o 600-900, etc. If your story is true, the guy got screwed, but what was the p/c for ''bust in'' was it a domestic assault on a 19 y/o daughter? Did the guy resist arrest? Was the guy's name patrick? :roll: :roll:[/quote]

Nobody got screwed. Even with only one nut. Just because you file a million dollar lawsuit does not mean you will hit the big payday. When the number crunching ends, there's always the fact that you can be held for a certain amount of responsibly percentage wise for your personal injury which will in fact bring the monetary award down. And get your mind out of the east end, there is more to Long Island than Nassau and Suffolk County. By the way, Nassau and Suffolk juries are known to be far less generous than Queens, Brooklyn, Staten Island, and Manhattan. If that happened out here, a low ball figure on that would be a 200 grand award.

How about this one for fodder...Cops bust in...Eyeball a silver object...Think it's a knife but it's only a spoon...Beat the S H I T out of the guy so much he's loses a nut...And in the end he sues... Gets 400 grand for a lost nut...That should make him happy Pretty lame, to begin with a nut is worth more like a million, but the story isnt funny, creative or worth ready

Nothing funny about it...Just basic facts and true...As for a nut being worth more like a million...Don't flatter yourself.[/quote]So? Who cares stupid pointless story, "a guy loses his nut, sues.Yay thanks for sharing"
No in reality, 1 lost testicle for a young 18-28 year old is worth over 1 million, 28-35 y/o 900- 1 million, 35-42y/o 600-900, etc. If your story is true, the guy got screwed, but what was the p/c for ''bust in'' was it a domestic assault on a 19 y/o daughter? Did the guy resist arrest? Was the guy's name patrick? :roll: :roll:[/quote]

Nobody got screwed. Even with only one nut. Just because you file a million dollar lawsuit does not mean you will hit the big payday. When the number crunching ends, there's always the fact that you can be held for a certain amount of responsibly percentage wise for your personal injury which will in fact bring the monetary award down. And get your mind out of the east end, there is more to Long Island than Nassau and Suffolk County. By the way, Nassau and Suffolk juries are known to be far less generous than Queens, Brooklyn, Staten Island, and Manhattan. If that happened out here, a low ball figure on that would be a 200 grand award.[/quote] You still dont get it a nut is worth to the injured exactly what i stated, after legal fees, my brother lost his nut in 1989 due to negligence of a hospital during hernia surgery. That was not a malicious act or the result of a criminal act as you alledge, in Nassau county he was 31 years old, he took home 950k. In todays day and age the number might be higher. That was a act of negligence not criminal, which would push the total higher.
You dont know what you are talking about and you are making up ''ballpark figures'' keep quiet

[testing1234]

like this see? Its not hard open 2 pages read and reply then hit submit

[Guesswho]

You still dont get it a nut is worth to the injured exactly what i stated, after legal fees, my brother lost his nut in 1989 due to negligence of a hospital during hernia surgery. That was not a malicious act or the result of a criminal act as you alledge, in Nassau county he was 31 years old, he took home 950k. In todays day and age the number might be higher. That was a act of negligence not criminal, which would push the total higher.
You dont know what you are talking about and you are making up ''ballpark figures'' keep quiet

Now, this is where you are the atypical mis-informed person who always assumes that just because someone has filed a personal injury suit for millions on paper that they will actually get millions after a trial by jury. A jury can make an award and hold the plaintiff a certain percentage accoutable for the personal injury he suffered. And in this case, they did. He only got 400 grand for losing a nut because of the way he was physically assaulted by the police during the course of the arrest. Which by the way could have turned out a lot worse since they assumed the shiny object in his hand was a knife, instead of a spoon and they could have easily shot him dead, and rightly so. Plus, he was known to the local police already and not as a law abiding citizen. As for ballpark figures, I have seen plaintiffs walk out of court and not recieve a red cent from a jury. So button it up yourself and go hide under your brothers remaining testy.

[important details left ou]

You still dont get it a nut is worth to the injured exactly what i stated, after legal fees, my brother lost his nut in 1989 due to negligence of a hospital during hernia surgery. That was not a malicious act or the result of a criminal act as you alledge, in Nassau county he was 31 years old, he took home 950k. In todays day and age the number might be higher. That was a act of negligence not criminal, which would push the total higher.
You dont know what you are talking about and you are making up ''ballpark figures'' keep quiet

Now, this is where you are the atypical mis-informed person who always assumes that just because someone has filed a personal injury suit for millions on paper that they will actually get millions after a trial by jury. A jury can make an award and hold the plaintiff a certain percentage accoutable for the personal injury he suffered. And in this case, they did. He only got 400 grand for losing a nut because of the way he was physically assaulted by the police during the course of the arrest. Which by the way could have turned out a lot worse since they assumed the shiny object in his hand was a knife, instead of a spoon and they could have easily shot him dead, and rightly so. Plus, he was known to the local police already and not as a law abiding citizen. As for ballpark figures, I have seen plaintiffs walk out of court and not recieve a red cent from a jury. So button it up yourself and go hide under your brothers remaining testy.Ahh some new details magically pop up, the stories evolves with every post.
You mean like ms cant@re didnt get one red cent?

The bible to personal injury liers er I mean Lawyers are the jury award books that are published for every county. Jury award books list how much prior juries in a given county have awarded to prior plaintiffs for a particular injury or tort. Long Island juries are more conservative about giving away money. The best place to get a jury award is the Bronx where the mutants give away much more money than any other surrounding county.

The bible to personal injury liers er I mean Lawyers are the jury award books that are published for every county. Jury award books list how much prior juries in a given county have awarded to prior plaintiffs for a particular injury or tort. Long Island juries are more conservative about giving away money. The best place to get a jury award is the Bronx where the mutants give away much more money than any other surrounding county.Right like I said one nut in Nassau county in 1989 due to Dr.s negligence was worth take home 950k to a 31 y/o umarried without children. I believe the original suit was for over 2 mil.
If you are a crosseyed bipolar transsexual( with intact scrotum) that has a spoon anally impacted and resists arrest on a full moon leap year last wednesday of march, from the postal police,as the prior idiot posted the details over 3 seperate posts, instead of telling the whole story in one post, its worth significantly less

He is obsessed with finding stories on the web because he pooped and peed in his trunk?

1. Feldberg, M. (1985). Gratuities, Corruption and the Democratic Ethos of Policing: The Case of the Free Cup of Coffee, Moral Issues in Police Work. F. Elliston & M. Feldberg.
2. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
3. Feldberg, M. (1985). Gratuities, Corruption and the Democratic Ethos of Policing: The Case of the Free Cup of Coffee, Moral Issues in Police Work. F. Elliston & M. Feldberg.
4. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
5. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
6. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
7. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement.
8. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
9. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
10. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities. Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
11. Wesylan College Faculty, NC. (2004, January 6). Police Deviance and Ethics.
12. Wesylan College Faculty, NC. (2004, January 6). Police Deviance and Ethics.
13. Sherman, L. (1974). Police Corruption: A Sociological Perspective. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
14. Gilmartin, K. M. Ethics-Based Policing. Undoing Entitlement. .
15. Coleman, S. (2003/6). "When Police Should Say "NO" to Gratuities., Centre
For Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
Hey in one of your lame defenses didnt you state the pot was given to you by 1 of your buddies because he knew u were a cop and wanted a pba card??