Elmer Glue
02-09-2005, 05:50 PM
This is an open letter, which you are welcome to use as you wish. I want as many people as possible to know that The Suffolk Police Department's bons mots are as devoid of meaning as the squawk of an angry bluejay. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable in our society -- the sick, the old, the disabled, the unemployed, and our youth -- all of whose lives are made miserable by The Suffolk Police Department. I cannot promise not to be angry at The Suffolk Police Department. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads The Suffolk Police Department -- to plague our minds.
The more I think about the worst classes of short-sighted gasbags there are, the more troubled I become by The Suffolk Police Department's endeavors. Come on, The Suffolk Police Department; I know you're capable of thoughtful social behavior. Although The Suffolk Police Department has repeatedly denied charges of attempting to weaken family ties, I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing it of planning to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to its hastily mounted campaigns. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: It doesn't reck one whit about how others might feel, and everyone with half a brain understands that. The Suffolk Police Department's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of The Suffolk Police Department's grunts, who loudly proclaim that phallocentrism brings one closer to nirvana. Regardless of those untoward proclamations, the truth is that each rung on the ladder of fascism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for it to deliver an additional blow to dignity and self-worth. That is the standard process by which irresponsible wonks dismantle the family unit. If you've read any of the mad slop that The Suffolk Police Department has concocted, you'll certainly recall The Suffolk Police Department's description of its plan to commit all sorts of mortal sins -- not to mention an uncountable number of venial ones. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that there is a format The Suffolk Police Department should follow for its next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
The Suffolk Police Department's lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of notions. Others are in the form of invectives. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. It's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about The Suffolk Police Department and about hypothetical solutions to our The Suffolk Police Department problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that if you've read this far, then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. How dare The Suffolk Police Department criticize my values when its are so obviously satanic? You don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that the acid test for The Suffolk Police Department's "kinder, gentler" new inclinations should be, "Do they still pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a debauched coterie of Bonapartism?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that The Suffolk Police Department's statements such as "Every word that leaves The Suffolk Police Department's mouth is teeming with useful information" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual.
The Suffolk Police Department's dissolute sophistries are an epiphenomenon of insecure priggism. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper, because it's the news that just doesn't fit. So, The Suffolk Police Department, maybe the problem is not with the most dirty tricksters I've ever seen, but with you. I believe I have finally figured out what makes organizations like The Suffolk Police Department lead people towards iniquity and sin. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. The foregoing analysis is self-evident, even if it is sometimes overlooked. Less evident are the specific ways in which we should instill a sense a responsibility and maturity in those who use mass organization as a system of integration and control. I want to keep this brief: The Suffolk Police Department is out to defile the present and destroy the future. And when we play its game, we become accomplices.
As you can see, if you read between the lines of The Suffolk Police Department's put-downs, you'll undoubtedly find that The Suffolk Police Department sees people like you and me as the perfect drones for its future globalist regime. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it surely expresses how The Suffolk Police Department often starts with a preconceived story and then plugs in supposed "information" in order to create a somewhat believable tale. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that before I knew anything about it, I was once an onlooker at a few of The Suffolk Police Department's mass demonstrations, without possessing even the slightest insight into the mentality of its satraps or the nature of its "compromises"? I would venture the answer has something to do with militarism. To elaborate, The Suffolk Police Department is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. As it turns out, The Suffolk Police Department believes that those who disagree with it should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by The Suffolk Police Department and its addlepated legatees. The Suffolk Police Department's manifestos are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. I don't care what others say about The Suffolk Police Department. It's still hotheaded, dysfunctional, and it intends to treat people like bleeding-heart, fickle hermits.
I wouldn't even mention that as a dynamic historical current, vandalism has taken many different forms and has evolved dramatically in some ways if it weren't true. If one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows that you should never forget the three most important facets of The Suffolk Police Department's rantings, namely their ostentatious origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. On a completely different tack, The Suffolk Police Department's attempts to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things are much worse than mere demagogism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. As a dynamic, historical current, nihilism has taken many different forms and has evolved dramatically in a variety of ways. Natural law is therefore the fulcrum upon which rests the case that if The Suffolk Police Department had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that it unquestionably believes that anyone who resists it deserves to be crushed. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is it living in? I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that I would never take a job working for it. Given its ophidian shell games, who would want to? Perhaps The Suffolk Police Department has never had to take a stand and fight for something as critical as our right to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. But it has been said that the union of theory and practice, in its hands, becomes a union of pomposity and post-structuralism. I, in turn, contend that if it weren't for hypocritical humanity-haters, it would have no friends.
If you're still reading this letter, I wish to compliment you for being sufficiently open-minded to understand that The Suffolk Police Department's remarks always follow the same pattern. It puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that coldhearted bigamists and moonstruck nudniks should rule this country. Posterity will have little occasion to glorify The Suffolk Police Department's "heroic" existence in a new epic. I'll say that again, because I want it to sink in: The Suffolk Police Department has a near-legendary lack of common sense, decency, and manners.
Poison is countered only by an antidote. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: The Suffolk Police Department's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Now that I think about it, we must provide some balance to The Suffolk Police Department's one-sided wheelings and dealings if we are ever to stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must indeed pursue because The Suffolk Police Department wants us to think of it as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that it wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If The Suffolk Police Department really wanted to be a do-gooder, it could start by admitting that there's always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that The Suffolk Police Department maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around it. There's a word for that: libel.
I have given this issue a great deal of thought, and I now have a strong conviction that The Suffolk Police Department keeps saying that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, I feel no more personal hatred for it than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. The Suffolk Police Department is offended by anything that might suggest that this makes its tirades seem grumpy and even a bit demonic. Ergo, documents written by its expositors typically include the line, "The Suffolk Police Department has its moral compass in tact", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that harebrained bitter-types like The Suffolk Police Department often think they have the right to form the association in the public's mind between any zingers The Suffolk Police Department disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity, then there is decidedly no hope for you.
The Suffolk Police Department says that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools. If I am correct that this is kind of a touchy subject to some people, then it has written volumes about how the few of us who complain regularly about its histrionics are simply spoiling the party. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why it's no secret that it provides simplistic answers to complex problems. My peers think that we can't stand idly by and let it clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought. While this is unmistakably true, I suspect we must add that its perspective is that it holds a universal license that allows it to rescue despotism from the rubbish heap of history, dust it off, slap on a coat of cheap sophistry, and market it as new and improved. My perspective, in contrast, is that the tone of The Suffolk Police Department's subliminal psywar campaigns is eerily reminiscent of that of aberrant, pudibund scroungers of the late 1940s, in the sense that The Suffolk Police Department makes free and liberal use of chicanery, deceit, intolerance, lust, persecution, and oppression. And I can say that with a clear conscience, because The Suffolk Police Department's agendas are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, The Suffolk Police Department exhibits an overweening sense of entitlement and a predilection for depreciating others. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that The Suffolk Police Department and its backers are, by nature, wicked proponents of parasitism. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but The Suffolk Police Department's commentaries all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that it's okay to divert our attention from serious issues. Let us now join hands, hearts, and minds to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: Everything The Suffolk Police Department writes is littered with spelling errors, grammatical mistakes, missing punctuation, irregular capitalization, false statements, and incoherent thoughts and sentences.
The more I think about the worst classes of short-sighted gasbags there are, the more troubled I become by The Suffolk Police Department's endeavors. Come on, The Suffolk Police Department; I know you're capable of thoughtful social behavior. Although The Suffolk Police Department has repeatedly denied charges of attempting to weaken family ties, I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing it of planning to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to its hastily mounted campaigns. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: It doesn't reck one whit about how others might feel, and everyone with half a brain understands that. The Suffolk Police Department's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of The Suffolk Police Department's grunts, who loudly proclaim that phallocentrism brings one closer to nirvana. Regardless of those untoward proclamations, the truth is that each rung on the ladder of fascism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for it to deliver an additional blow to dignity and self-worth. That is the standard process by which irresponsible wonks dismantle the family unit. If you've read any of the mad slop that The Suffolk Police Department has concocted, you'll certainly recall The Suffolk Police Department's description of its plan to commit all sorts of mortal sins -- not to mention an uncountable number of venial ones. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that there is a format The Suffolk Police Department should follow for its next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
The Suffolk Police Department's lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of notions. Others are in the form of invectives. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. It's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about The Suffolk Police Department and about hypothetical solutions to our The Suffolk Police Department problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that if you've read this far, then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. How dare The Suffolk Police Department criticize my values when its are so obviously satanic? You don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that the acid test for The Suffolk Police Department's "kinder, gentler" new inclinations should be, "Do they still pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a debauched coterie of Bonapartism?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that The Suffolk Police Department's statements such as "Every word that leaves The Suffolk Police Department's mouth is teeming with useful information" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual.
The Suffolk Police Department's dissolute sophistries are an epiphenomenon of insecure priggism. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper, because it's the news that just doesn't fit. So, The Suffolk Police Department, maybe the problem is not with the most dirty tricksters I've ever seen, but with you. I believe I have finally figured out what makes organizations like The Suffolk Police Department lead people towards iniquity and sin. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. The foregoing analysis is self-evident, even if it is sometimes overlooked. Less evident are the specific ways in which we should instill a sense a responsibility and maturity in those who use mass organization as a system of integration and control. I want to keep this brief: The Suffolk Police Department is out to defile the present and destroy the future. And when we play its game, we become accomplices.
As you can see, if you read between the lines of The Suffolk Police Department's put-downs, you'll undoubtedly find that The Suffolk Police Department sees people like you and me as the perfect drones for its future globalist regime. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it surely expresses how The Suffolk Police Department often starts with a preconceived story and then plugs in supposed "information" in order to create a somewhat believable tale. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that before I knew anything about it, I was once an onlooker at a few of The Suffolk Police Department's mass demonstrations, without possessing even the slightest insight into the mentality of its satraps or the nature of its "compromises"? I would venture the answer has something to do with militarism. To elaborate, The Suffolk Police Department is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. As it turns out, The Suffolk Police Department believes that those who disagree with it should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by The Suffolk Police Department and its addlepated legatees. The Suffolk Police Department's manifestos are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. I don't care what others say about The Suffolk Police Department. It's still hotheaded, dysfunctional, and it intends to treat people like bleeding-heart, fickle hermits.
I wouldn't even mention that as a dynamic historical current, vandalism has taken many different forms and has evolved dramatically in some ways if it weren't true. If one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows that you should never forget the three most important facets of The Suffolk Police Department's rantings, namely their ostentatious origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. On a completely different tack, The Suffolk Police Department's attempts to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things are much worse than mere demagogism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. As a dynamic, historical current, nihilism has taken many different forms and has evolved dramatically in a variety of ways. Natural law is therefore the fulcrum upon which rests the case that if The Suffolk Police Department had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that it unquestionably believes that anyone who resists it deserves to be crushed. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is it living in? I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that I would never take a job working for it. Given its ophidian shell games, who would want to? Perhaps The Suffolk Police Department has never had to take a stand and fight for something as critical as our right to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. But it has been said that the union of theory and practice, in its hands, becomes a union of pomposity and post-structuralism. I, in turn, contend that if it weren't for hypocritical humanity-haters, it would have no friends.
If you're still reading this letter, I wish to compliment you for being sufficiently open-minded to understand that The Suffolk Police Department's remarks always follow the same pattern. It puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that coldhearted bigamists and moonstruck nudniks should rule this country. Posterity will have little occasion to glorify The Suffolk Police Department's "heroic" existence in a new epic. I'll say that again, because I want it to sink in: The Suffolk Police Department has a near-legendary lack of common sense, decency, and manners.
Poison is countered only by an antidote. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: The Suffolk Police Department's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Now that I think about it, we must provide some balance to The Suffolk Police Department's one-sided wheelings and dealings if we are ever to stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must indeed pursue because The Suffolk Police Department wants us to think of it as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that it wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If The Suffolk Police Department really wanted to be a do-gooder, it could start by admitting that there's always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that The Suffolk Police Department maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around it. There's a word for that: libel.
I have given this issue a great deal of thought, and I now have a strong conviction that The Suffolk Police Department keeps saying that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, I feel no more personal hatred for it than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. The Suffolk Police Department is offended by anything that might suggest that this makes its tirades seem grumpy and even a bit demonic. Ergo, documents written by its expositors typically include the line, "The Suffolk Police Department has its moral compass in tact", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that harebrained bitter-types like The Suffolk Police Department often think they have the right to form the association in the public's mind between any zingers The Suffolk Police Department disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity, then there is decidedly no hope for you.
The Suffolk Police Department says that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools. If I am correct that this is kind of a touchy subject to some people, then it has written volumes about how the few of us who complain regularly about its histrionics are simply spoiling the party. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why it's no secret that it provides simplistic answers to complex problems. My peers think that we can't stand idly by and let it clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought. While this is unmistakably true, I suspect we must add that its perspective is that it holds a universal license that allows it to rescue despotism from the rubbish heap of history, dust it off, slap on a coat of cheap sophistry, and market it as new and improved. My perspective, in contrast, is that the tone of The Suffolk Police Department's subliminal psywar campaigns is eerily reminiscent of that of aberrant, pudibund scroungers of the late 1940s, in the sense that The Suffolk Police Department makes free and liberal use of chicanery, deceit, intolerance, lust, persecution, and oppression. And I can say that with a clear conscience, because The Suffolk Police Department's agendas are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, The Suffolk Police Department exhibits an overweening sense of entitlement and a predilection for depreciating others. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that The Suffolk Police Department and its backers are, by nature, wicked proponents of parasitism. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but The Suffolk Police Department's commentaries all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that it's okay to divert our attention from serious issues. Let us now join hands, hearts, and minds to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: Everything The Suffolk Police Department writes is littered with spelling errors, grammatical mistakes, missing punctuation, irregular capitalization, false statements, and incoherent thoughts and sentences.