Frivolous Dem Claims Coming?

[Foot Soldier]

I heard from someone who was at a meeting with Bigh Joe last night, where it was said that the Dems are about to unleash a barage of "frivolous" claims against Republican committeemen arising out petition fraud. Does anyone have any info.
Are they looking at us or just the big guys? Me and my pals are just a bit worried.

[Worried Too]

A buddy of mine is a Dem with a big mouth. He told me that this is in response to the Denenberg investigation. He says that the Dems have literally hundreds of bad petitions with forged signatures. He said, that while most are from the rank and file, there are some big names implicated. Although, he wouldn't say who, he said there is at least one TOH councilman with bad signatures and a Congressman's daughter with really bad forgeries. Does King have a daughter? I'll try and get more information, but I think he knows I'm not sympathetic.

[Dave the Rave]

Take the deal!

[guest 1]

Say what you want he is in trouble....

[TOH petitioner]

i know these gals and guys personally

all signatures of mine are legitimate

[Dillon Demons]

Anyone know what Dave D's deal could be?

[cheap shot]

king's daughter is a successful lawyer and in no need of a job or a favor. a sweet kid active in the bar association whose first law job was in house with swiss air legal department. married now maybe 4 years and he don't need no help either. dems are petty little shitheads gonna lose their shirts in november. they had their fun playing house waving their fists and thumping their chests now all the puny little nothings gotta give up the house cos in november mama and dada gonna be home. they come after us and we beef on them and we got more on them then they got on us. tit for tat.

[Worried Too]

My buddy confirmed it was King's daughter. He said that she actually signed a family members signature, which she then witnessed, and had one family member of a Seaford Republican Leader sign for numerous others on multiple petitions. It appears to be as bad if not worse then what people on this board are accusing Denenberg of doing. I got plenty of husbands signing for wives on mine. He also said that a close relative of Kate Murray's has bad signatures, as does the Town clerk, and he thinks one of the Muscarellas. I hope it stops here. This could be a mess.

[King John]

All should be punished if guilty. All should have their head examined. Does Dave cop a plea?

[King Larry]

Looks like Larry Levy found one such claim not so "frivolous".

[Another Guest]

From the editorials, it sure looks like Newsday isn't going to let go of the allegations of wide spread petition problems until the system is changed.

[Snoozday readuh]

Oh, right... Newsday.

"Allegations," you said.

"Wide Spread Problems," you said.

"Not Going To Let Go," you said.

Why do these terms sound so vaguely familiar to me?
I'm sure they're normal, everyday phrases - I guess that they're just not in common "Circulation," one might say?

As Bill Cosby's "G-D" said to "Noah:"
"RIIIGHT!"

[Another Guest]

Whatchutalkingaboutwillis. Some Dems want to push this to the max, but those are the ones with clean signatures. Others are inpersonating Al Haig, and trying to stop it in its tracks. Legitimate Dem Leadership, if there is such a thing, have publicly stated that they don't want it pursued further and those who know the make up of those leaders, know they really do want it stopped. Why fight, when you can make love. Republican Leaders know that no matter how bad the Dem signatures are, theirs are worse, much worse, and they want the investigation stopped. They can't throw more Dem petitions infront of Dillon because 1 his office can't handle it, and 2 it comes off completely retalitory 3 it escalates the investigation on all signatures and 4 they can't find a committeeman with clean signatures to file it.

Newsday is the only entity that can push Dillon into moving on this, and since it sells papers, they will. In the end, Dillon investigates, decides that he can't indict everyone, so he indicts the system, and no charges are ever brought. Cooler heads prevail and the system is reformed.

[well....]

Looks like Larry Levy found one such claim not so "frivolous".

Ahhh...this is going to be so much fun to watch....I think the only ones who will make out like bandits in this one will be the lawyers....I can see it now...Republicans make a claim, Democrats fire back, and so on. The question becomes...."Mr. Dillon, how many Republicans and Democrats will be arrsted and charged after the war is over and the dust settles?"

[ZeFly]

On very solid authority Dillon told King that regardless of what the petitions show, he will not prosecute Erin or for that matter anyone else. End of Story. We win.

[Is this name taken too?]

Taxpayers money is better spent going after the robbers, rapists and auto stealers.

[FatBobbyP]

Taxpayers money is better spent going after the robbers, rapists and auto stealers.

and don't forget Democratic Legislators/

[Banquo]

On very solid authority Dillon told King that regardless of what the petitions show, he will not prosecute Erin or for that matter anyone else. End of Story. We win.


If Dillon really said that or intimated that, then he should step down. All credibility is gone. A prosecutor should prosecute like crimes regardless of who did it. Seems to me that there are a lot of legacies at stake here.

[Fish hook]

Why? It's his perogative whether or not to prosecutive. If he decided he's not wasting the taxpayers money with this politically based nonsense then so what? It's his discretion. If he told King he already decided he's not going to let them sucker him into the mudhole their trying to play in - then what's the problem? He's honest, upfront and not playing any secret games. Good for Dillon.

He's honest, upfront and not playing any secret games. Good for Dillon.

Actually, that's selective prosecution, and it means he's a hypocrite, who has no credibility.

[Selectively prosecuted]

Duh? What good is having the discretion to decide which cases should be prosecuted if you have to prosecute all cases brought to your attention? Write to your State Legislator to change the law if you don't like it - don't blame Dillon. Each case is different. Denns case there's obviously 3 witnesses to testify against him. Dillon has the evidence to substantiate the case and so it's prosecutable. Plus, the guy confessed. Always good for the prosecution huh? In the other cases there may be holes, pure speculation, conjecture - no witnesses - no proof - maybe no truth either. If the DA can't win, the DA doesn't prosecute. That's the way it is. That's the system.