PDA

View Full Version : APPELLATE DECISION IN KAPSIS CASE !!


ITS FINAL
03-07-2003, 03:56 PM
Press Release - March 7th, 2003

The NYS Appellate Division today affirmed the decisions of the Supreme Court and dealt a FINAL death blow to the self proclaimed Chairmanship of Independence Party, claimed by James L. Kapsis. Both the Supreme Court, and now the Appellate Division, recognize Michael S. Peragine as the Chairman of the Independence Party of Nassau County. It is now the law of the land.

Although the issue was not proper subject material in today’s proceeding, Kapsis’ lawyers argued for approximately 20 minutes before four (4) Appellate Court Judges that Peragine should not be deemed Chairman of the Independence Party for (what they argued) was many purported reasons. The Court, however, in a UNANIMOUS decision, ruled that the appellant’s (Kapsis, et. al.) contentions were without merit. END OF STORY !!

The Appellate Court today also considered Independence Party nominations for Trustees in the Village of Hempstead, one of the nation’s largest villages, who’s population exceeds 65,000 residents. Four Trustees had been previously nominated - two by the Proper Leadership of the Party - and two by Mr. Kapsis and company.

The Supreme Court removed the Kapsis’ nominees from the ballot several weeks ago, and, today, the Court of Appeals affirmed the Supreme Court’s Decision.

Consequently, only one slate of candidates for the position of Village Trustee for the Independence Party will be on the ballot in the March 18th, Hempstead Village Election - the slate submitted by the acknowledged Chairman of the Independence Party, Michael S. Peragine. That slate will consist of “Betty Cross” & “Henry Holley”.

This brings to an end the arrogance and pomposity of James L. Kapsis, who has continued to claim to be Chairman of the Independence Party, long after his Interim Organization was replaced by a full County Committee, and long after he lost his bid for Chairmanship of the Party by a weighted vote of 2765 votes to 48 votes, at the Party’s Organizational Meeting last September.

:

not true Mike
03-07-2003, 04:40 PM
Kapsis was not even a party to the case Peragine is referring to. It was between the republican candidates and the democrat candidates battling for the I line in the Hempstead race. Peragine supported the republicans and the democrats objections were dismissed on procedural grounds. The case did not address the ultimate chairmanship issue. That's being addressed in Kapsis' cases which are very much alive.

Although Kapsis was not a party to the case, Peragine was a party in the case fighting vigorously for the republicans. It makes one wonder how the voters will react to this given the DA's investigation of Peragine for massive election fraud.

Dear Mr Kapsis
03-08-2003, 03:20 AM
Dear Mr. Kapsis:

How very shameful of you to try to spin the decision of the Supreme Court, Affirmed by the Appellate Division, as one grounded in some technical anomaly.

The technical anomaly you refer to is the fact that the Court found that YOU ARE NOT THE CHAIRMAN OF THE INDEPENDENCE PARTY and that Mr Peragine is.

It was for that reason that your candidates were thrown off the ballot. Trying to characterize that concept as a technical problem is simply an out-right LIE. But that hasn't seemed to stop you from making such statements in the past !!

Anyone who wishes to verify the contents of the Supreme Court Decision can review it by loging on to:

www.decisions.courts.state.ny...593-03.pdf

Mr. Kapsis why not give up the Ghost - and stop trying to keep this debate ongoing at the expense of the Party you claim to be so important to you.

Your scorched earth policy has gone on long eno

not true Mike again
03-08-2003, 04:08 AM
I read the decision. The court states that the ultimate chairmanship issue will be decided in other actions which Kapsis is a party. You are a fool Mike and you do not make a good attorney.

SORRY JIM
03-08-2003, 04:14 AM
JIM:

YOU KNOW THE OTHER ACTION YOU REFER TO IS A FARCE !!!

IT WILL BE INTERESTING TO SEE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY WHEN YOU LOSE THAT ONE - LIKE YOU HAVE LOST THE SIX OR SEVEN OTHERS TO DATE !!

MY - YOU ARE A SORE-LOOSER !!

wrong again Mike
03-08-2003, 06:13 AM
You are truly a fool Mike. If you consider the ADA's appearance in court to be a farce there is something wrong with you. Any candidate you support will truly be hurt by their association with you.